Benchmarking Diversity in Image Generation via Attribute-Conditional Human Evaluation

Isabela Albuquerque, Ira Ktena, Olivia Wiles, Ivana Kajić, Amal Rannen-Triki, Cristina Vasconcelos, Aida Nematzadeh

Benchmarking Diversity in Image Generation via Attribute-Conditional Human Evaluation: 5 upvotes on Hugging Face Daily Papers, #14 of 18 papers on 2025-11-14. Day-by-day upvote history.

Despite advances in generation quality, current text-to-image (T2I) models often lack diversity, generating homogeneous outputs. This work introduces a framework to address the need for robust diversity evaluation in T2I models. Our framework systematically assesses diversity by evaluating individual concepts and their relevant factors of variation. Key contributions include: (1) a novel human evaluation template for nuanced diversity assessment; (2) a curated prompt set covering diverse concepts with their identified factors of variation (e.g. prompt: An image of an apple, factor of variation: color); and (3) a methodology for comparing models in terms of human annotations via binomial tests. Furthermore, we rigorously compare various image embeddings for diversity measurement. Notably, our principled approach enables ranking of T2I models by diversity, identifying categories where they particularly struggle. This research offers a robust methodology and insights, paving the way for improvements in T2I model diversity and metric development.

Paper page on Hugging Face · arXiv

Data: hysts-bot-data/daily-papers-stats and the Daily Papers API. Open data: tardellirs/paper-pulse-data. Sister project: Model Pulse, the download history of every model on the Hub.