When Personalization Misleads: Understanding and Mitigating Hallucinations in Personalized LLMs

SunZX, Yi Zhan, chenglei shen, Weijie Yu, Xiao Zhang, Ming He, Jun Xu

When Personalization Misleads: Understanding and Mitigating Hallucinations in Personalized LLMs: 16 upvotes on Hugging Face Daily Papers, #6 of 22 papers on 2026-01-19. Day-by-day upvote history. It lost 11 votes when the Hub removed votes in bulk.

Personalized large language models (LLMs) adapt model behavior to individual users to enhance user satisfaction, yet personalization can inadvertently distort factual reasoning. We show that when personalized LLMs face factual queries, there exists a phenomenon where the model generates answers aligned with a user's prior history rather than the objective truth, resulting in personalization-induced hallucinations that degrade factual reliability and may propagate incorrect beliefs, due to representational entanglement between personalization and factual representations. To address this issue, we propose Factuality-Preserving Personalized Steering (FPPS), a lightweight inference-time approach that mitigates personalization-induced factual distortions while preserving personalized behavior. We further introduce PFQABench, the first benchmark designed to jointly evaluate factual and personalized question answering under personalization. Experiments across multiple LLM backbones and personalization methods show that FPPS substantially improves factual accuracy while maintaining personalized performance.

Paper page on Hugging Face · arXiv

Data: hysts-bot-data/daily-papers-stats and the Daily Papers API. Open data: tardellirs/paper-pulse-data. Sister project: Model Pulse, the download history of every model on the Hub.